Right now we are looking at the Dow Jones Industrial Average turn higher after a sharply lower open.
Right now the Dow Jones Industrial Average is trying to eke out a small gain of about 30 points.
Meanwhile, the Nasdaq remains lower and off by a little over 150 points, while the S&P 500 is still down, pulling back by -0.4%.
Meanwhile, we are looking at crude oil futures holding session gains.
Dollars cover two main buckets including private issued stablecoins and central bank digital currencies, but a roadblock does remain.
Traditional blockchains are public, meaning every transaction is visible, but retailers, corporate treasuries, and energy traders may not want pricing or strategy revealed.
So how do we make digital currency private enough for enterprises but transparent enough for regulators?
Well, here to discuss the future of Financial privacy on chain is Katherine Kirkpatrick Boss, general counsel for Stark.
Catherine, great to have you here.
Thank you so much for joining.
Thanks for having me.
Well we know that we're talking about chains of privacy is important so for financial institutions.
Why is it so important?
Well, you have an environment where everything is moving on chain your real time seeing markets move on chain in large part due to tokenization.
And this is all great in theory.
There's massive advantages with cost, speed, atomic settlement, etc. but the problem is markets as they stand are not visible.
You know, you don't have proprietary trading strategies visible to the average investor.
You have potential for abuse with that kind of transparency, so this is an impediment to getting a critical mass of trading and market movement on chain where it is transparent and we're talking about a highly regulated space.
So the question is how.
It's a great question because for a long time privacy was a bad word when it came to regulators.
There was an immediate association when you're talking about privacy with money laundering, with mixers.
We've seen some signs of hope on that front.
The SEC convened a roundtable on financial.
Surveillance and privacy to discuss this and Chair Atkins at that roundtable specifically said that individuals interested in privacy technology, there should not be a negative association, and you know builders building privacy technology should be allowed to do that.
However, institutions are still a little wary of engaging with privacy technology generally because they know that that could be a lightning rod for bad guys.
And speaking of the regulatory landscape while I have you here, I do want to get your take on some of the conversations that are taking place on the nation's capital regarding this.
So there's been a lot of back and forth and of course all of us are looking for clarity.
So where are we right now?
Well, we're hoping for.
A compromise on the yield provision, you know, the banks and the crypto market participants are quite far apart.
We've heard rumors that there is some sort of potential compromise resolution where basically the mediators in the room are saying neither of you get what you want.
This is still a priority for the administration, so I would say crypto as an ecosystem remains cautiously optimistic and hopeful that we will get legislation, but there are also a number of macro factors.
I mean, obviously this is not the administration's number one priority right now and some impediments along the way to getting that legislation and indeed all of our focus has been on the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, and that is something that continues to affect all markets and all asset classes.
But you mentioned tokenization, so I do want to get your take on securing the 24/7 market.
So usually Monday through Friday, the equity markets open at 9.
30 and close at 4, but given all of the volatility, there has been a lot of focus on features on Sunday evening and also on purposes.
So how do we actually go about securing it's the absolute ultimate unlock, right?
And that's a that's a big argument.
Some people will say, well why is 24/7 trading good?
Like there's negatives to 24/7 trading.
I mean, but we're in an increasingly global market, right, and the need to hedge in times of great.
Volatility like we're seeing in real time, it's becoming more and more important and you also decrease capital risk and counterparty risk with tokenization by enabling real-time settlement and you cut costs.
So I think tokenization has always been an incredible crypto use case for traditional financial services because it's very easy to understand in the abstract the advantages of putting something into a mechanism that is immediately tradable, easily tradable, cheap.
Tradable as opposed to a lot of frankly the logistical impediments that exist when the assets are not tokenized and finally, before I let you go for the viewer out there who's trying to figure out the importance of privacy and digital dollars, what would you say to them in a nutshell in layman terms?
Well, look, when you think about privacy, everyone is entitled to privacy and for a long time the US has lost the thread on privacy.
You know privacy should exist in the US because it's.
Fundamental right to express our morals and values and have privacy as a mechanism to do that.
I'm talking about charitable donations or healthcare spend.
If that's on chain, an individual doesn't get privacy.
Privacy is also really compelling from a payment perspective.
It's really interesting.
A lot of crypto companies will pay their employees in stablecoins in USDC, and that's incredible.
Think about living in South Africa with the rand or living in Argentina and getting paid in USDC.
That's fantastic.
It's life changing for those individuals.
But do we want that on chain?
Absolutely not.
You don't want everybody in your company to know how much you're getting paid.
So that is the next unlock for the true usability of markets and multiple use cases on chain.
Well, thank you so much for joining us on a busy day.
I appreciate your time and all of your insights.
Thanks so much for having me.
Thank you.